Environmental A Natural Resource Economics â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Environmental A Natural Resource Economics? Answer: Introduction Global warming has been one of the issues of pertaining debates and concerns among the environmentalists, policy-makers and governing authorities across the globe, since the last century. With the advent of the Industrial Revolution the problem has aggravated even more as the uncontrolled industrial activities went on increasing, thereby causing considerable adverse effects on the global environment. Over the years, lack of awareness, clubbed with tremendous urbanization and globalization led to substantial usage of petrol, diesel and other non-renewable fossil-fuels, which in its turn added to the burden of global carbon emission and the resulting rise in the temperature of world (Trenberth and Fasullo 2013). In the recent times, understanding the adversity of this phenomenon, many countries are trying to take reform measures to combat and mitigate the magnitude of the problem. The essay takes into account the policy announced by France, to ban all the petrol and diesel driven cars by 2040 and assuming the policy to be enacted tries to look from the economic point of view, the market failure which is subjected to by this policy. It also discusses about the possible effects of this ban on the related industries, using the economic concepts of demand and supply (Independent.co.uk 2017). Banning policy announced by France The above discussed policy to ban diesel and petrol vehicles, as announced by the new environment minister of the country, falls under the cluster of reform measures that targets to make the country entirely carbon neutral by the end of 2050. Together, these policies, as thought by the governing authority, can be considered as commendable on part of the countrys policy-makers as these in the long run shows potential to efficiently target the ever-persisting grave issues of environmental degradation, pollution and global warming. Being a part of the commitments made by the country in the Paris Agreement, this plan also includes the termination of palm oil imports from any part of the world as the same also significantly contributes to a massive level of deforestations in many parts of the world. This policy, if enacted appropriately, may have huge implications on the country and the world as a whole, not only in the environmental perspective but also in many other aspects. In terms of economics, the need for this policy can be explained in terms of the concept of market failure, which the policy is expected to target (Dolfsma 2013). This is explained in the following section. Market Failure and negative externalities In terms of economics, a market failure can be defined as the situation, which arises when there is inefficiency in allocation of the scarce resources across the economy, such that there remain opportunities to make some people better off without making any other person worse off. This in its turn, often gives rise to a linked situation of negative externality in the market (Keohane and Olmstead 2016). The term externality, in economics, means the effect (positive or negative) which is experienced by some individual, due to the occurrence of a transaction, in which he or she is not directly involved. In this context, negative externality can be referred to as the cost, which the individual, being a third party, incurs, without being directly participating in the transaction (Rezai, Foley and Taylor 2016). Market Failure in Pollution: This aspect of market failure takes into account the unfair burden of costs, which arises from the production of goods, and services, which involves emission of pollutants in the atmosphere, thereby decreasing the overall welfare of the society as a whole. In the concerned scenario, the excessive usage of petrol and diesel driven cars gives rise to a similar kind of situation (Naud 2013). The non-renewable fossil fuels like petrol and diesel are sources of huge carbon and green house emission following combustion. The usages of these in the vehicles, therefore, increases the carbon content in the atmosphere, significantly, which form a part of the trace gases, the latter having the characteristics of absorbing heat in low frequencies. This in turn, leads to an overall increase in the temperature of the global atmosphere, which in other words is known as Global Warming and has huge negative implications on the overall global welfare and also poses as a credible threat to human existence (Lehmann 2012). Therefore, it can be seen that the cost of using petrol and driven cars are higher than the private cost of the users of these cars as it also includes a huge social cost, which can be shown with the help of the following diagram: Figure 1: Negative externalities in Pollution (Source: As created by the author) As can be seen from the above figure, the equilibrium in the free market occurs at the point where the marginal private cost is equal to the marginal benefit that is at the point A, with the equilibrium output being Q and the price being P. However, as the commodity here is fossil fuel, the marginal social cost of using the same, is higher than that of the marginal private cost as it also involves the loss of welfare of the third party individuals in the society as a whole who are not directly involved in this usage of petrol and diesel. Therefore, in this scenario, there is a loss of welfare in the society, of amount CAB (Tietenberg and Lewis 2016). If the socially acceptable output has to be taken into account, then the point of production will be B, where the marginal social cost equated the marginal benefits. As can be seen from the above diagram, the output, in this case, reduces to Q1 and price increases to P1. The policy, as announced by France, plans to decrease the usage of fossil fuel to socially optimal level by implementing the ban on the petrol and diesel vehicles (Carraro, Katsoulacos and Xepapadeas 2013). Remedies for market failure In general the policies targeted to reduce negative externalities include agreements between the parties involved or the intervention of the government, which taxes the parties creating negative externalities and subsidizes those are adversely affected by the same, according to the Coase Theorem. In this scenario, the government of France has designed policies of premiums for the poorer section of households, which will help them exchanging their vehicles for cleaner ones. The producers of these vehicles are expected to experience the taxing burden in the form of loss of sales with the implementation of the policy, which thereby abides by the Coase Theorem (Chipman and Tian 2012). Effects on ban on related markets The petrol and diesel driven cars being the backbone of transport in any country, imposing a ban on them, implies a huge paradigm shift in the transport industry of the country, thereby affecting the overall productivity of the economy significantly. Robust and cost effective alternatives need to be developed and implemented, as more or less every industry of an economy is related to the transport infrastructure of that economy (Ostrom et al. 2012). In this scenario, the imposition of a ban on the petrol and diesel vehicles will hamper the industry of petrol and diesel vehicle, in the international scenario, adversely as they will suffer from a severe fall in the demand: Figure 2: Fall in demand for petrol and diesel vehicles (Source: As created by the author) Figure 2 shows the reduction in the overall demand of petrol and diesel vehicles, that the industry in the global scenario is expected to face due to the imposition of the ban as has been proposed by the Government of France. On the other hand, with the recent awareness generation regarding the adverse effects of fossil fuels, many automobile companies are coming up with innovations in this field. They are emphasizing on electricity and other renewable sources for their vehicles. Some of the pioneers in this field are Tesla, BMW and others. The government of many countries are also introducing eco-friendly public transports which are made by different companies in order to address this issue. Therefore, the ban on the petrol and the diesel vehicles by France, is expected to increase the demand for eco-friendly cars both by the private households as well as government as the ban is expected to increase the usage of public transports. Figure 3: Increase in demand for vehicles using renewable fuel resources (Source: As created by the author) The ban can therefore, increase the overall demand for eco-friendly transports significantly, which, as can be seen from the above figure, can attract new players in the market and also can influence the old suppliers to change the nature of their vehicles from polluting ones to eco-friendly ones, thereby strengthening the eco-friendly transport industry (Tacconi 2012). Conclusion It can be concluded from the above discussion that the ban on petrol and diesel vehicles, as has been announced by the French Government, being a commendable step towards achieving pollution free environment, also is expected to have significant implications on the economic scenario of the country as well. The policy targets to reduce the market failure, which arises in case of pollution, which creates huge social costs over the marginal private costs and leads to negative externalities. As can be seen from the above discussion, the policy, if enacted properly, can lead to significant shift in the global transport industry (both positive and negative), which in turn can affect the economic scenario of the country itself and the global economic scenario as a whole. References Carraro, Carlo, Yiannis Katsoulacos, and Anastasios Xepapadeas, eds.Environmental policy and market structure. Vol. 4. Springer Science Business Media, 2013. Chipman, John S., and Guoqiang Tian. "Detrimental externalities, pollution rights, and the Coase Theorem."Economic Theory49, no. 2 (2012): 309-327. Dolfsma, Wilfred.Government failure: Society, markets and rules. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013. Independent.co.uk, Chloe. 2017. "France Is Banning All Petrol And Diesel Vehicles".The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/france-petrol-diesel-ban-vehicles-cars-2040-a7826831.html. Keohane, Nathaniel O., and Sheila M. Olmstead. "Introduction." InMarkets and the Environment, pp. 1-10. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, 2016. Lehmann, Paul. "Justifying a policy mix for pollution control: a review of economic literature."Journal of Economic Surveys26, no. 1 (2012): 71-97. Naud, Wim. "Entrepreneurship and economic development: Theory, evidence and policy."Browser Download This Paper(2013). Ostrom, Elinor, Christina Chang, Mark Pennington, and Vlad Tarko. "The Future of the Commons-Beyond Market Failure and Government Regulation." (2012). Rezai, Armon, Duncan K. Foley, and Lance Taylor. "Global warming and economic externalities." InThe Economics of the Global Environment, pp. 447-470. Springer International Publishing, 2016. Tacconi, Luca. "Redefining payments for environmental services."Ecological Economics73 (2012): 29-36. Tietenberg, Thomas H., and Lynne Lewis.Environmental and natural resource economics. Routledge, 2016. Trenberth, Kevin E., and John T. Fasullo. "An apparent hiatus in global warming?."Earth's Future1, no. 1 (2013): 19-32.